Bastian Blank <wa...@debian.org> (2024-03-04): > On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 09:01:06PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Maybe have it marked Not-For-Us on armel, also requesting the binary to > > be dropped there? And maybe poke the ftp team to have installer-armel/ > > cleaned up? (The “disabling daily builds” part being trivial.) > > i would remove the d-i package itself (don't we already set the > supported architectures?)
No, at least not in debian/control, that's why I'm asking. I would love to avoid having to maintain a list of architectures… > Cleanup installer-armel. ACK. > Remove armel specific udeb sources (I doubt we hve any). Doesn't ring a bell. > I would not try to remove udebs itself but just continue to build them. Sure, nothing to gain there. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
