Your message dated Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:30:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gphoto2: Please, package gphoto2 2.1.6pre releases
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2005 09:23:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 15 02:23:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from genarin.hispalinux.es [193.127.103.90] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DiU73-0004G5-00; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 02:23:09 -0700
Received: by genarin.hispalinux.es (Postfix, from userid 1019)
        id AD73A10D582; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:23:08 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:23:08 +0200
From: Jesus Climent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gphoto2: Please, package gphoto2 2.1.6pre releases
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gphoto2
Version: N/A; reported 2005-06-15
Severity: wishlist

Please, package the 2.1.6pre version of gphoto2 and libgphoto2, which includes
support for newer cameras, like canon 350d

Thanks!

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux genarin 2.4.30 #1 lun may 16 23:26:29 CEST 2005 i686
Locale: LANG=es_ES, LC_CTYPE=en_US

-- 
Jesus Climent                                      info:www.pumuki.org
Unix SysAdm|Linux User #66350|Debian Developer|2.6.10|Helsinki Finland
GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429  7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69

There are only two possible explanations: either no one told me,...
or no one knows.
                --Neo (Matrix Reloaded)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 314225-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jul 2005 15:30:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 27 08:30:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cytise.entrouvert.com (mail.entrouvert.be) [84.207.4.3] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1Dxnrx-0001Gn-00; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:30:53 -0700
Received: from lesdeveloppementsdurables.org ([81.56.247.131] helo=trap)
        by mail.entrouvert.be with asmtp (Exim)
        (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
        id 1Dxnrw-0005gI-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:30:52 +0200
Received: from fred by trap with local (Exim 4.52)
        id 1Dxnru-0005Nw-In
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:30:50 +0200
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:30:50 +0200
From: Frederic Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gphoto2: Please, package gphoto2 2.1.6pre releases
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux (testing/unstable with kernel Linux 2.6.11)
X-Uptime: 17:30:05 up  8:51,  9 users,  load average: 0.71, 0.25, 0.14
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Version: 2.1.6-1

libgphoto2 2.1.6 has been uploaded.

Regards,

        Frederic


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to