On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:44:33AM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Charles Plessy wrote: > > > If you think that it is necessary to obtain the agreement of the d-i team to > > mention the udebs in #697433, please go ahead, but on my side, I do not > > think > > that there is a problem here. > > I guess I'm completely failing to communicate. > > udebs are already documented very clearly. There is _no point_ in > policy replicating that. Policy is meant to help multiple people > cooperate to make the Debian system work in a consistent way --- > adding some docs about udebs would not help that at all.
In that case there could be a udeb subpolicy document maintained by the d-i team that policy would refer to. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
