On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 08:35:36AM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Bill Allombert wrote:
> > In that case there could be a udeb subpolicy document maintained by the > > d-i team that policy would refer to. > Yeah, that would be fine with me, even though I still don't see the > point. > Is there a git subpolicy describing how git is packaged? A gnome > subpolicy about gnome packaging? > The only difference for udebs is that the work is spread over packages > throughout the system. They are still maintained by the d-i team. That's not accurate at all. The installer team are consulted on the question of which packages should be made available as udebs, but for shared libraries the maintenance of the udeb definitely lies with the library maintainer, not the installer team. So it makes perfect sense to me that we would want the requirements for udebs documented centrally where all maintainers can refer to them. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
