Le Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 03:08:47PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh a écrit : > On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > > do you have examples of packages having empty fields in source package > > control > > files ? I have not found any. (In the sense that a field that only > > contains > > a substitution variable is not considered empty). > > They come from empty substitutions, yes.
Then they are not empty: there is a big difference between "Depends:" and "Depends: ${foo}". I think that it would be very confusing if we would refer them as empty. Also, the bug started with a problem where "empty" means "nothing after the colon". Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org