Santiago Vila <sanv...@unex.es> writes: > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 03:21:18PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Debian Policy decided, in Bug#768292, to include MPL-1.1 and MPL-2.0 >> in common-licenses. This change was made and uploaded to the archive >> in debian-policy release 3.9.7.0. As noted in a follow-up note, this is thankfully not true. Someone commited a bunch of changes to the Debian Policy Git repository adding changelog entries under the 3.9.7.0 heading, but those changes weren't included in the upload. I then got confused. This change will be in the forthcoming 3.9.9.0. > Side comment: A binary package does not seem very canonical to me. Is > there an official URL for this? (I'm trying to avoid anybody nitpicking > with formatting, extra spaces and the like, as it happened at least once > in the past with some GPL license). Yes, good point. These appear to be the canonical plain text versions of the licenses from Mozilla: https://www.mozilla.org/media/MPL/1.1/index.0c5913925d40.txt https://www.mozilla.org/media/MPL/2.0/index.815ca599c9df.txt as linked from here: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/MPL/ -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
