Frank Küster wrote: > Thanks for noticing. So that makes > > --- tpm2deb.cfg (Revision 1941) > +++ tpm2deb.cfg (Arbeitskopie) > @@ -529,6 +529,9 @@ > blacklist;tpm;pgf;* > depends;texlive-full;pgf (>= 1.01.dfsg.1-1), latex-beamer (>= > 3.06.dfsg.1-0.1), latex-xcolor (>= 2.09-1) > recommends;texlive-pictures;pgf (>= 1.01.dfsg.1-1) > +# beamer is in collection texlive-latex-extra, but prosper is in > +# *-recommended. This doesn't make sense: Let beamer be > +# recommended by texlive-latex-recommended > recommends;texlive-latex-recommended;latex-beamer (>= 3.06.dfsg.1-0.1) > recommends;texlive-latex-recommended;latex-xcolor (>= 2.09-1) > # > > For this part of the "bug".
Looks good. As for errors in the description we have texlive-latex-recommended: claims to contain xcolor texlive-latex-extra: claims to contain beamer texlive-pictures: claims to contain pgf Unfortunately I have no idea how these descriptions are created. cheerio ralf
