I believe my patch is safe because for the old behaviour (process name) it 
only removes error provoking condition on request->server-:sim being set, 
introduced by port numbrer patch, and does not change anything else. This 
condition is only applicable in case of port number, I think.

On the other hand, I can not imagine a real-life example when 
request->server->sin is not set. I think this can only happen using 
tcpdmatch, so maybe correcting this utility to set request->server->sin 
instead of (or in addition to) patching the library would be more 
appropriate.

Janusz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to