(ccing the bug report to archive relevant info)

On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 10:46 +0200, Stefan Bellon wrote:

> Why isn't it possible to just include those from the source package into
> the binary package? Or, make another package nsis-uis which provides
> them? This package could even go into non-free or something like that if
> the source to modern.exe and the other UIs is missing.

It is, and I'm including these in the next upload. I quote from my reply
to the bug report and the nsis forum thread:

----------------------
The reason for this is that there is no source for the UIs (other than
default.exe), and I've generally not installed stuff that doesn't have
source code.

According to [1], there is no available source code, so I guess I'll
just include them in the next upload.

In the meantime, please test the package as much as possible (with your
own .nsi files, and or with the examples) so I can fix as many problems
as I can in the next upload (rather than fixing just this bug). It would
be especially useful if you could copy the exe files from the
orig.tar.gz and place them in /usr/share/nsis/Contrib/UIs and test the
modern UI.

1. http://forums.winamp.com/showthread.php?postid=1642451#post1642451
----
Generation of Contrib\UIs\modern*.exe, Contrib\UIs\sdbarker_tiny.exe? 

Does anyone have any more info on how Contrib\UIs\modern*.exe and
Contrib\UIs\sdbarker_tiny.exe are generated than "All of the other
executables are modified versions of default.exe. Resource Hacker was
used to modify them."? Are there .rc files for the changes?
----
There's no more information. That's how they were generated. If you want
to generate them from source, you might want to try to extract the
resources and recompile them with windres. But unless you must not
include any executables in your package, there's no reason to recompile
those.
----
Hmm, ok, I'll just include them then, since the .exe files can be
considered source code in and of themselves.

Out of curiosity, what exactly were the changes?
----
Only the dialog resources were changed. That's what the ChangeUI command
uses. Open them with a resource editor or use ChangeUI to use them and
see how it differs from the default UI.
-----------------------

> Looking at the bug database, it looks like one day later than this
> email, the bug got already filed as #304678 into the bug database and I
> don't have to do it.

Yep.

I plan to let the current version get into testing/sarge (3 day wait),
then get my sponsor to upload it at medium urgency (5 day wait). My
sponsor says it will be more than 10 days before sarge is released.

-- 
bye,
pabs

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to