At Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:13:25 +0200, Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote: > On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 05:29:47PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > Should Linux man page be updated to mention _POSIX_C_SOURCE? > > > > I also don't know it should be described to linux man pages - if you > > think so, please reassign it to manpages-dev. However linux manpages > > is not the only reference, I think. > > Sure, but it would be nice to have it at least there. > > > > BTW, defining _POSIX_SOURCE, which is described in the glibc > > > documentation, didn't work for me. Is it a bug, or does "POSIX.1" mean > > > POSIX 1990 only? > > > > "/usr/include/features.h" describes the actual detail, please check it > > out. > > Thanks for the hint! At that time I had only grepped for the macros; now > I saw the comments in the beginning of the files. Seems that nanosleep > was not part of IEEE Std 1003.1; this answers my question.
OK :) How do you think that this bug report should be reassigned to manpages-dev, or simple close? Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
