Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> Stefen, can you please, this and next time you merely
>> increases severity, give at least some hint about your
>> justification?
> 
> I thought from the original report it was obvious that this makes kvm
> unusable, therefore this bug is not only important. I cannot
> successfully start kvm at all, except when using the -no-kvm switch. But
> with that, kvm is just the same as qemu.

Thank you for the explanation.

> I have an intel core i7, therefore the statement that this only affects
> intel could be correct, but that was not present in the bug report
> before I bumped the severity.

It's not "only" on Intel.  There are many people who run kvm
on intel, and several kvm developers are all-intel shops too.
I mentioned that the bug is difficult to reproduce, and that
is on Intel CPU too.  But I see it now from your side, and yes,
for you the package is unusable and hence severity is understandable.

Meanwhile, can you please try 0.12.3 package from my site as
I mentioned before (see the bug in question).  Thanks!

/mjt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to