If it's so important, why is it orphaned? I'm thinking that if the SPARC folx can't be bothered to maintain their bootloader, perhaps the port's utilization of resources needs to be called into question... What's the point in Debian proper showing more support for SPARC than the SPARC community shows for Debian?
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Ben Collins wrote: > On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 03:22:21PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote: > > > > |silo (195 days old) > > > > Has this package been removed from unstable and if yes, why? It's > > currently still listed in the wnpp but I could find it which apt-cache > > search silo. > > You can only remove this if you want sparc to be unbootable, which I > hope is not your intention. > > -- Pardon me, but you have obviously mistaken me for someone who gives a damn. email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
