There was some discussion [1] about an ITP I filed last year for a package called email [2], which suffered from an inappropriate license and name problems.
The upstream has since released a newer version under the GPL and has indicated to me a willingness to have the package called eMail. My question is if this change of capitalization acceptable to Debian, or would it still insist on a different package name? It has been recently accepted into Cygwin with the email name [3] and upstream is, for that reason, not too keen to radically alter it. If eMail is not reasonable name, can anyone suggest one that is? Thanks, Millis [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/06/msg01651.html [2] http://email.cleancode.org/ [3] http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-10/msg00385.html -- Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org) Debian Project (http://www.debian.org)