On Tue, Sep 29 2009, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> Improving quality may be strictly unnecessary, and may be not directly
>> productive, but that doesn't mean there's no good reason to expect it.
>
> Improving quality only for the sake of it is not necessarily a good
> idea.
!!!
If we are trying to provide the best OS ever, improving quality
is _always_ a good idea. It might be too hard, or too time consuming,
to implement all the quality improvements, but that does not make the
improvement of quality "not a good idea".
> I do agree that if everyone but Debian expects foo to be called as
> foo.pl, there is a bug in Debian.
I think I disagree. As my mother used to say, if all your
friends jump into the well, that does not make it a good idea.
manoj
--
"The one charm of marriage is that it makes a life of deception a
neccessity." Oscar Wilde
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
