On 18/11/14 07:20, Guido Günther wrote:
> Note that nothing withing gbp forces you to use gbp-pq.
I know; but the gbp-pq-like repository structure, as produced by git
import-dsc with no special options, is a popular one (pkg-perl and their
> 3000 packages, as well as smaller teams like -telepathy, -utopia,
-systemd) so any comparison of repository structures should probably
include it.
I've been trying to be consistent about calling it gbp-pq and not gbp,
because I am aware that git-buildpackage does not specifically require
this structure.
S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/546b0b7b.4000...@debian.org
