Hi, Adding in his or callbacks would be easy enough. Do you have an idea of what you would need for your use case?
Manoj On November 13, 2015 9:22:45 AM PST, Vincent Danjean <vdanjean...@free.fr> wrote: >Le 13/11/2015 17:47, Marc Haber a écrit : >> Actually, I don't quite see why ucf would need hooks since it is >> called from the maintainer scripts, giving the local admin full power >> of creativity anyway. Chances are that ucf is already the right tool >> to maintain systemd and friends the Debian way if the Debian >packaging >> team would be willing to. > >Because I cannot see a way (but diverting ucf itself) to interface it >with etckeeper so that original maintainer files will be kept in a >different git branch with merges in the master branch to keep the >modified config. > > Regards > Vincent > >-- >Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0xD17897FA vdanj...@debian.org >GPG key fingerprint: 621E 3509 654D D77C 43F5 CA4A F6AE F2AF D178 97FA >Unofficial pkgs: http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html >APT repo: deb http://people.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
