On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 08:39:02 +0000, Neil Williams <codeh...@debian.org> wrote: >On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 09:07:56 +0100 >Marc Haber <mh+debian-de...@zugschlus.de> wrote: > >> On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 00:20:33 +0100, Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> >> wrote: >> >Amen. I'm much happier how the last couple of releases were handled. >> >The release team(s) did an outstanding job. >> >And things like autoremovals are a god send. >> >> I am not opposed to autoremovals. I am opposed to removing packages >> and not letting them back in after the bugs were fixed just because we >> can. We have never done this, and we shold not do that for stretch. > >That is just an untruth, sorry. > >At some point before the end of every freeze for every release, we have >*always* done this. It is inevitable. It may be (and preferably will >be) a short period at the very end of the freeze.
Of course. What I have understood is that this will be general freeze policy from the beginning for stretch. I might have misunderstood in the talk, and I didn't find a general freeze policy document to read up on this yet. Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834