Le sam. 21 avr. 2018 20:04, Chris Lamb <la...@debian.org> a écrit : > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > The tip of the iceberg are some recent cases where Python 2 modules > > were dropped that still had reverse dependencies in unstable > > I suspect developers may be reading too much into Lintian output, > reading them as "Please remove your Python 2.x module". > > The motivating behind these tags were to prevent new Python 2.x > packages being added to the archive (due to habit if anything > else!) unless they were needed or requested, of course. >
Indeed, python 2 modules are not forbidden, but NEW packages are *expected* to provide python 3 plus optionally python 2 support, not python 2 only. But good reasons would allow package to be accepted anyway. I think that warning is really to hint users to go to python 3 which should be default now.... Olivier > > Suggestions for rewording gratefully received. > > > Regards, > > -- > ,''`. > : :' : Chris Lamb > `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk > `- > >
