Stephan Seitz <stse+deb...@fsing.rootsland.net> writes: > On Di, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:49:55 +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote: >>accept that they are authoritative in this regard. Therefore, you should >>rename the offensive parts of this package. > > He certainly should NOT rename any parts of the package without > upstream consent.
Why not? I can see an argument about not confusing users (though transitional packages / a weboob-offensive could be made for the old names / etc), but I don't think that's where you're going here. Regards, Matthew -- "At least you know where you are with Microsoft." "True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle." http://www.debian.org
