Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What on earth would be the point of that? It won't magically become > free just because the "wider community" doesn't want to make it > free. If you are seriously suggesting that we would compromise our > principles because the "wider community" doesn't like them, then sod > off.
We don't need to compromise our principles. We need to be able to explain them clearly, and be able to counter the arguments made against them. > They do not have anything to add to the discussion. Particularly since > it's not even a discussion at present, but merely those of us who've > been thinking about this stuff for a long time shooting down the FUD > of those who haven't thought about it at all. Enjoying the view from inside my head? -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
