On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 05:08:08PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Matthew Garrett wrote: > >I'm not convinced by the trademark argument - I think it's pretty clear > >from the HTML that it's not intended to be part of the license. Yes, it > >would be better if that was made clearer, but: > > > >a) CC appear to have said that it's not part of the license, and: > > This one falls, for me, under the "since it's so easy to fix, why exactly > aren't they fixing it?" category.
... and the fact that they refuse to fix such a simple thing bodes very ill for getting more serious problems fixed ... -- Glenn Maynard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
