> Well, I can name one minor problem of the MIT license: it requires that > the license text be preserved. For most uses, this isn't a problem; but > in the case where you're using bits of code under the license and releasing > binaries, it's odd to carry along in your documentation a paragraph about > rights granted to users for a bit of code that they weren't given source > to.
How big are the bits? Remember, inclusion of the license is only necessary in copies or substantial portions. Heh. Although, as to what makes up a substantial portion may be subject to argument, so I can imagine there being some uncertainty there. ;) -- Regards, James William Pye -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
