Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [snip]
> > Umm; the .sch and .pcb files are not really source code; they are more > > like .pdf files. Also, I'm using a GPL rather than BSD license for the > > traditional philosophical reasons: this is an addition to the commons, > > rather than a gift to the public domain. > > If the .sch and .pcb files are not the preferred form for making > modifications, then what is? The .sch file is only the preferred form for making modifications when loaded into an application, which presents a rendering of it. You would *not* edit the .sch file; you would use gschem to work on it. So it's equivalent to, say, a gimp save-file. The .pcb file is similar. > Could you distribute that? In that > case, you could use a slightly modified GPL, where you replace "object > code" with "non-source derivative works". > > Regards, > Walter Landry > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- rich walker | technical person | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED] front-of-tshirt space to let 251 Liverpool Road | London N1 1LX | +UK 20 7700 2487