On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 11:28:25AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > If you want to say that a particular judgement can have both moral and > technical aspects, that's fine; but saying that any judgement which > has moral aspects can never be justified by technical means is false, > and claiming that any of the DFSG's judgements don't contain technical > aspects is simply false.
I think that's clearer and "correcter" than what either of us said before... Cheers, Nick -- Nick Phillips -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Keep it short for pithy sake.
