On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 11:23:11AM +0100, Anthony Youngman wrote: > But as I see it, they (QM) are adding an extra restriction, as > proscribed by the GPL (clauses 6 and 7). > > "If you distribute to subsidiaries, you may not stop them distributing > to the world". But the GPL explicitly recognises internal distribution > as a case where the GPL is not needed.
I'm not sure what you're talking about here. I can't even find the word "internal" in the GPL. > comment about SCO wasn't that justified. It's just that I tried to do > exactly what they're trying to do, and I ended up being convinced it was > impossible - to make sure nobody could wrest an Open Source project away > from me ... > > TT can do it because they're trusted. MySQL can do it because they're > trusted. EasyCo are trying to do it with legal finesse ... I'm not sure what you're talking about here, either. [I could guess, but how likely are my guesses to be accurate?] -- Raul