On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 06:49:32PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 08:19:31AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > Certainly. But in no way should we be encouraging the fallacy that there > > *must* be packaged free content before we will accept a consumer of said > > content into the archive. > > The "quake2" and "lxdoom" packages are in contrib, due to lack of free data > sets. This is long and strongly established, I believe.
Lack of free data sets period, or lack of free data sets in the archive? - Matt