Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm not sure how to interpret this; I'm not familiar enough w/ SRP-Z. Is > this a different algorithm, such that the source would need to be > significantly modified (such that SRP-Z is essentially a separate thing, > convered by its own license; converting SRP-3 to SRP-Z is just as > difficult as converting openssh to SRP-Z)? Is this merely a layer on top > of SRP-3 (thereby restricting a derived work, and making it > DFSG-incompatible)?
If you take that argument to its "logical conclusion" then no software is DFSG-free, because patents restrict all derived works. (Given any free software, it is possible to modify it so that it infringes some patent that is being actively enforced; therefore no free software can be freely modified.)