On 2004-08-10 15:44:48 +0100 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 02:48:16PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
Please, I'd appreciate any news on ocaml moving to CECILL being
posted to
debian-legal, if you can do that. TIA.
Read the mailing archive, i think i posted it two times already. [...]
Please understand that I can't do everything. Tracking -legal already
takes up a lot of my time and I'm not paid for this. You seemed to
hear about this anyway, so it looked cheapest to ask you to continue
telling us. That way, I hope we avoid some "why didn't you warn anyone
about this" and "why didn't you get involved with the discussion if
you care" accusations if relicensing goes badly for debian's users.
this is too early to discuss here now, and i will sure keep
debian-legal
informed about any such moves.
Thanks.
The Compiler is distributed under the terms of the Q Public License
version 1.0 (included below).
I don't think this is still "the" QPL after the (permitted) edits,
but [...]
It is the plain QPL, the only change being the choice of law, which
trolltech
allowed to change, and now plainly states that the choice of law is
the french
one, and nothing more.
Can it be described as "the Q Public License version 1.0 with a change
to choice of law" instead, please?
--
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and not of any group I know
http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing
Please email about: BT alternative for line rental+DSL;
Education on SMEs+EU FP6; office filing that works fast