* Andreas Barth: > Actually, the DFSG says: > | 2. Source Code > | > | The program must include source code, and must allow distribution in > | source code as well as compiled form. > > Obviously e.g. fonts are no programms, even if they are in main.
It's clear from the context (and previous discussion) that this has to be interpreted as "software". At least I hope so. It would be rather ridiculous if documentation under the GNU FDL (with invariant sections, just to be sure) is not DFSG-compliant, but some BSD-licensed non-editable PDF file is. 8-( -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
