* Florian Weimer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050728 16:19]: > * Steve McIntyre:
> >>The interpretation I outlined is certainly not new. It reflects the > >>current practice, and I think we're in a pretty good position as far > >>as compliance is concerned. Even the notorious GNU FDL issue is not a > >>real problem here (beyond the invariant section business) -- the GNU > >>FDL requires open formats. > > I'm arguing with your interpretation of "program" to mean anything you > > want - in this case potentially any random string of bytes. > Why do you think this would change anything? Isn't this the > assumption under which debian-legal operates in general? Actually, it is not the assumption under which the DFSG operates in general. Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]