Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. The modified version must be labeled as such.
Seems ok. > 2. The person making the modifications must be identified. Fails the dissident test, but there's some level of disagreement over whether that matters. > 3. Acknowledgement of the original author must be retained. No problem. > 4. The location of the original unmodified document be identified. I don't think this ought to be a problem. > 5. The original author's (or authors') name(s) may not be used to > assert or imply endorsement of the resulting document without t= > he > original author's (or authors') permission. That's fine. The others are requests rather than requirements, so there's no problem there. In summary - I'd be surprised if anyone filed RC bugs against stuff under this license. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
