On 1/27/06, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are non-malicious reasons for releasing software under completely > proprietary licenses. Good intentions don't make a restriction more free.
Nor do bad intentions make a restriction non-free. What makes a restriction non-free is that it prevents some free use of the software. "Adobe might go nuts and harrass people" is independent of any license provision. There's also little or no evidence that changing this jurisdiction clause would make the software any more free, even if we hypothesize that someone crazy at Adobe is going to start harassing users of this software using specious court actions, starting next week. -- Raul