Macallister Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > The problematic kind of trademark clauses is the one that says "you >> > lose your _copyright_ license if you use our trademark in ways we're >> > not happy with". >> >> Why is that any more problematic than the 3-clause BSD license? > > It's about arbitrary marks, not someone's name. Why do you think > they are comparable?
If the objection is "It's a breach of the copyright license to break the law in this specific manner", then they're directly comparable. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
