"Andrew Saunders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/10/06, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If you fail, well, I fear there is currently no license for >> documentation that has been approved by -legal. > > Actually, the MIT license[1] covers documentation: > > --- > Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining > a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the > "Software")
Well, in that sense most other software licenses cover documentation, e.g. the GPL - that was the main point of my statement. But I see no license that was specifically designed and worded to apply to "documentation but not programs", as many upstream authors seem to search. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)
