On Tue, 1 May 2007, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: > > First of all, the interpretation we wish to claim consistency under is "all > > bits that are distributed by Debian must follow the DFSG". Copyright law is > > not distributed by Debian, and needs no exception. > Neither do licenses, which are distributed because of necessity,
Something that is distributed by necessity is still distributed. Copyright law is actually *not distributed* by Debian. We don't have a text file which says "Current Copyright Law" and which includes excerpts from legal codes and judges' decisions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
