On 11274 March 1977, Matthew Johnson wrote: >> I can ask the author if would distribute under some DFSG free license, >> but in the case that he declines, is there any other clarification >> needed before it can be included in non-free? > This looks like it gives us permission to distribute it in non-free if > you can get it licenced under a DFSG-compatible licence.
Err, what? If its dfsg compatible then its fine for main. The current license is idiotic but acceptable for non-free. -- bye Joerg <pasc> man <pasc> the AMD64 camp is not helped by the list of people supporting it <pasc> when nerode is on your side, you know you're doing something wrong -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]