Hi, OK, I'll try to do that. Thank you very much to you and the rest for your advices.
Cheers. On Monday 12 July 2010 23:15:59 Francesco Poli wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 19:44:33 +0200 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: > > [...] > > > So what should I do about this whole issue? Summarize all the problems > > that we've pointed out and write to this list and the authors to > > discuss the whole issue together? Ask to them and post here about > > their explanations, to know if they would be acceptable for Debian? > > ...? > > Since nobody else has replied so far, I'll express my own personal > opinion. > > I think that probably the safest course of action is summarizing the > issues to upstream copyright holders, without directly involving > them in debian-legal discussions. > I see it as a courtesy to upstream: discussions on this list may > sometimes become lengthy and not all upstream have much time to spend > on what, in some cases, may look like splitting hairs on legal > details... > Moreover, people on this list cannot individually speak on behalf of > the Debian Project (a number of participants, including me!, are not > even Debian Developers or Debian Maintainers): as a consequence, any > statement should be given time to be reviewed by other debian-legal > participants, before it's presented to upstream (and should not be > presented as the official Debian Project position, anyway). > > Of course, if you need further help, you can always come back to the > list and ask for opinions... -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201007151233.25041.manuel.montez...@gmail.com