Le Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 01:25:21PM +0100, Steve McIntyre a écrit : > Chris wrote: > > > >I think this clause in the license absolutely fails the dissident test > > Please point to the DFSG section that mentions the "dissident test".
Hi Steve, I think that the "dissident test" and others are indirectly mentionned to everyone who wants to join Debian: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/nm/trunk/nm-templates/nm_pp1.txt?revision=1246&view=markup 60 PH7. How do you check if a license is DFSG-compatible? 61 62 PH8. There are a few "tests" for this purpose, based on (not really) common 63 situations. Explain them to me and point out which common problems can 64 be discovered by them. I do not find these tests particularly useful, but as long as they are promoted this way, we are likely to see people using them on this lit. If you think they create more noise than signal, perhaps you or others can consider asking for a change to the NM templates via a bug reported to nm.debian.org. Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120917001842.ga6...@falafel.plessy.net
