Le Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 12:35:09PM -0500, Raphael Geissert a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > mejiko: thanks for pointing it out, I'm forwarding your report to our > debian-legal mailing list to seek their opinion. > > On Saturday 15 September 2012 03:15:10 mejiko wrote: > [...] > > ca-certificates packeages included Cacert Root certificates. > > This certificates licensed under Cacert Root Distribution License (RDL). > [...] > > http://www.cacert.org/policy/RootDistributionLicense.php > > https://lists.cacert.org/wws/arc/cacert-policy/2012-02/msg00031.html > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/CACert_Root_Distribution_License > > TL;RD; RDL looks non-free, Philipp Dunkel from CAcert says Debian is fine (to > distribute) because of the disclaimer re the certificates included in ca- > certificates, Fedora says it is non-free. > > What do the others think about it? > > To me, it doesn't just seem to be a (re-)distribution issue. Rather, the > need for an additional agreement with CAcert.
Hello Raphael, could it be a very strangely phrased disclaimer of warranty ? That "A lets B rely on A", is similar to "A warrants to B". Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120917002736.gc6...@falafel.plessy.net
