On 02/16/2014 09:21 PM, Sven Bartscher wrote: > Sorry, could you try to explain more clearly what you want to say?
Here is a slide (number 16) from Piana being more clear them me :-) | EUPL incompatible with GPL v.3 | * Why? Because of non reciprocity of compatibility? | * No such a thing, strong copyleft by design must be incompatible | ** GPL v.3 made by design incompatible with v.2 (but not with v.2+) | * Especially, EUPL is recessive | * GPL → EUPL → weak copyleft loophole http://epfsug.eu/wws/arc/epfsug/2012-07/msg00017/brussels_parliament_2012-2.pdf It was presented at an EPFSUG meeting where the license for AT4AM was discussed (before it was decided): http://epfsug.eu/blog-entry/delivering-vision-at4am-all Best regards. //Erik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5301bef2.7040...@gmail.com
