Hi all,

Le 25/05/2023 à 09:51, Andreas Tille a écrit :
Hi Nilesh,

Am Wed, May 24, 2023 at 10:16:22PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 11:28:13AM +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote:
Le 24/05/2023 à 08:25, Andreas Tille a écrit :
    
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/community/communication/-/blob/master/releasenotes/bookworm/release-notes.patch

Please review and comment on it (or just push fixes and enhancements)!
Is there any important piece of software we packaged during this release
cycle and that could be worth highlighting? From my limited perspective I
have none that comes to mind, but maybe it will for someone else.

I do remember that during the bullseye release, we were looking forward
to get nextflow into bookworm. AFAICS, that did not happen but I do see
a capsule-nextflow package.
Although it is mostly a deployment tool, _maybe_ it is worth a mention?

I've CC'ed Steffen for any inputs about the same.

Steffen?
IMHO I consider it less worth mentioning than shiny-server.

I agree. Let's (in my opinion) skip this and see it as a motivation to ship nextflow in Trixie.


Another package that should be mentioned is shiny-server -- we were
looking forward to have it for quite a while and it is finally there.
That said, it is a science team package and maybe deserves a mention
with the release-notes patch of that team.

I've just added shiny-server

diff --git a/releasenotes/bookworm/release-notes.patch 
b/releasenotes/bookworm/release-notes.patch
index 586dbdd..81d91c8 100644
--- a/releasenotes/bookworm/release-notes.patch
+++ b/releasenotes/bookworm/release-notes.patch
@@ -2,8 +2,10 @@
<para>
      As in every release new packages in the field of life sciences and 
medicine
-    were added.  We kept on to get Continuous Integration support for the
-    packages maintained by the Debian Med team.
+    were added.  The new package shiny-server might be worth extra mentioning
+    since it simplifies scientific web applications using R.  We kept on to get
+    Continuous Integration support for the packages maintained by the Debian 
Med
+    team.
      </para><para>
      The Debian Med team is continuously interested in feedback from users
      specifically in the form of requesting the packaging of not yet packaged


I admit I would like to reward the work of Nilesh, Étienne and Pierre
explicitly but I doubt whether release notes are the right place to
mention people behind the work.

Thanks in any case ;)
I also doubt, but possibly we can say something like "many libraries have been packaged in order to pave the way for future inclusion of more prominent software in the field"? Just an idea, nothing mandatory here, especially since this sentence is not very specific!


Kind regards
     Andreas.


Best regards,

--
Pierre

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to