> Are the new tools replacements or additional? Additional
> then ssh-tools-extra would make sense That's actually a good suggestion. Thank you > I don't see why adding a 3rd language > to the 2 already used makes things 'hard to package' The scripts are written with minimal dependency and tested with different OSes. So they are easy to package. Adding the Go ones I have some difficulties myself already: - 3rd party dependencies (which are packaged already luckily) - I am not yet familiar with packaging Go programs (just managed to create one yesterday) - I am not sure if that mixed package should then go to the [1] Go Packaging Team, and when, if they are OK with that mix of languages: So, yeah maybe after I have worked out these things, it is not that difficult anymore and actually I would also prefer to keep all in one upstream repo. I also don't want to make it any harder to package for [2]others [1] https://go-team.pages.debian.net [2] https://repology.org/project/ssh-tools/versions
