I discovered there are more lists than just this one, so I'll be forwarding the email to the appropriate list (which I believe to be debian-gl...@lists.debian.org). I should mention, I'm so glad I only supplied my first name as I did not know that y'all could even get the name I supplied to Google, much less that it would be published. I would rather not publish my name and only be referenced by email
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 6:29 PM Alexis E <alexis.public.em...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Debian Mailing List, > I am working on a project which requires libc6. When I build this > project on my laptop, the project works fine as it builds for the libc6 on > my laptop, however, when I build it in Github actions, the project fails to > run, due to Debian not having a libc6 version as low as GLibC 2.32. I've > tried to compile my project to musl, statically, and even just embedding > the correct version of libc6 in the lib folder that I set my rpath to. I've > either had segfaults or failed builds. I would like to ask how I can either > support an older version of libc6 or upgrade any customers' systems to the > correct version. I'd also happily accept not requiring libc6 at all. > > How may I achieve this? > > Thank You, > Alexis > > ```bash > ./project: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found > (required by ./project) > ./project: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.32' not found > (required by ./project) > ./project: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.34' not found > (required by ./project) > ./project: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found > (required by lib/libSDL2-2.0.so.0) > ./project: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.32' not found > (required by lib/libSDL2-2.0.so.0) > ./project: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.34' not found > (required by lib/libSDL2-2.0.so.0) > ./project: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found > (required by lib/libfreetype.so.6) > ``` >
