On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 05:17:37PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > On 07/13/2010 08:36 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote: > > OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du dimanche 11 juillet > > 2010, vers 23:05, Jakub Wilk <jw...@debian.org> disait : > > > >>> I'm working on package that uses CDBS > > > >> That's not a very good choice. > > > > Why? > > Because cdbs is an unmaintainable beast of Makefiles. I'm not sure who is > willing to keep the Python parts in there working. Since we have dh, which is > a > sane piece of code with a sane upstream, most new packages use dh. And I know > several people who are willing to update dh to work with new Python > versions/packaging changes if necessary.
Could you please point me to an existing python package that uses dh that I can use as an example starting point? An example package that handles a pure python modules and an extension module would be great. Cheers, - Matteo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100714185458.ga8...@burrow
