On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:03 PM Louis-Philippe Véronneau <po...@debian.org> wrote: > > On 2022-11-21 02 h 08, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > I'm just flagging this up here, with a question about how we should > > proceed. Certainly we are not ready to make Python 3.11 the default > > Python version!! > > This is a concern I share and I think I've been pretty vocal about it. > > I feel the state of python packages for Bookworm with 3.10 was pretty > good and it seemed reasonable to prioritize stability for our next > stable release :) > > It's very frustrating to work on packaging python libraries and apps for > a whole release cycle, just to see all that work put in the bin at the > last minute because upstream doesn't support 3.11...
this, 100 times > I've been told the current 3.11 transition was a test, and if it was > clear too many important things were broken and couldn't be fixed, we > would roll back and release using 3.10. why are we running a "test" this close to the release? *who* are we running this test for? who made this decision (i figure RT gave the go ahead, but still)? is there any searchable source for this claim? Thanks, -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi
