On Wednesday 06 October 2004 04:30 pm, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Josh Metzler [Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:05:18 -0400]: > > My comments > > to the original reporter about new debian revisions adding new symbols > > applies here, too. > > I don't think it's the case, the symbol reported not to exist by the
It is the case. The symbol _ZN4KPIM17AddresseeLineEdit7processERK8QCStringRK9QMemArrayIcERS1_RS5_ exists in libkmailprivate 4:3.3.0-3, but not in libkmailprivate 4:3.3.0-2. Why is this? New symbols shouldn't be appearing just in new Debian revisions, should they? If kmail 4:3.3.0-3 really needs libkdepim 4:3.3.0-3 and wont work with 4:3.3.0-2, then it either needs an explicit depends =4:3.3.0-3, or something needs to be done to keep it from using the new symbols. Josh