* Josh Metzler [Wed, 06 Oct 2004 17:35:14 -0400]: > On Wednesday 06 October 2004 04:30 pm, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > * Josh Metzler [Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:05:18 -0400]: > > > My comments > > > to the original reporter about new debian revisions adding new symbols > > > applies here, too.
> > I don't think it's the case, the symbol reported not to exist by the > It is the case. The symbol > _ZN4KPIM17AddresseeLineEdit7processERK8QCStringRK9QMemArrayIcERS1_RS5_ > exists in libkmailprivate 4:3.3.0-3, but not in libkmailprivate 4:3.3.0-2. s/libkmailprivate/libkdepim1/ I imagine. then I completely agree and I was mistaken before. every day one learns something new... > Why is this? New symbols shouldn't be appearing just in new Debian > revisions, should they? If kmail 4:3.3.0-3 really needs libkdepim > 4:3.3.0-3 and wont work with 4:3.3.0-2, then it either needs an explicit > depends =4:3.3.0-3, or something needs to be done to keep it from using the > new symbols. > Josh -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of car payments. -- Earl Wilson