Micha Feigin wrote:

I am guessing that the fact that most of these viruses etc. appear on
windows is more due to popularity then security.
The fact that it is also easier and thus every script kidy can patch up
a virus of of a couple of scripts found on the internet probably helps
also.
Linux is just not popular enough yet to entice script kidys and macs are
just to damn hard to program for (at list up to os9, don't know where
osX stands).

That's really not a valid argument. Case in point: Apache. If you take a quick look at Netcraft, Apache (not specifically Linux/Apache, but Apache on all OSes it supports) runs:

Developer       September 2003  Percent October 2003    Percent Change
Apache          27836622        64.52   28235972        64.61   0.09
Microsoft       10156289        23.54   10252227        23.46   -0.08
SunONE          1501241         3.48    1528090         3.50    0.02
Zeus            742950          1.72    735179          1.68    -0.04

So Apache runs almost three times the number of sites as IIS does, but IIS sites are cracked something like 3-to-1 compared to Apache (don't quote me on that, but that is what I seem to recall as the correct number and I can't find the reference).

Basically, when security is part of the original design process (as it has been with Apache, BSD, and Linux), it is easy to make a system/application that is by default very secure. OTOH, MS is struggling to maintain reverse compatibility but tighten things up, which decidedly harder than if they had simply started the design with security in mind.

Just my $.02

-Roberto

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature



Reply via email to