On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 15:11:04 -0500, hvw59601 wrote: > Camaleón wrote: >> On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 09:21:30 -0500, hvw59601 wrote: >> >>> lee wrote: >>>> T o n g <mlist4sunt...@yahoo.com> writes: >>>> >>>>> Time to look for an all purpose editor to replace emacs. >> >> And you want to drop it just because of a problem with your settings >> not being honored? Have you report it? >> >>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_text_editors >>>> >>>> You might as well use emacs more, there are so many little details >>>> one doesn't think about anymore and then misses in others ... >>>> >>>> >>> Funny thing, that does not have my favorite editor: mc. >> >> +1 for mcedit but I guess is far away from being a proper emacs >> replacement O:-) >> >> > But ought it not be part of a comparison of text editors?
Well, Tong was looking for an emacs replacement and emacs can do more than the job of a text editor. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/k2i7k4$rra$4...@ger.gmane.org