On 7/22/14, Erwan David <er...@rail.eu.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:19:54PM CEST, Andrei POPESCU > <andreimpope...@gmail.com> said: >> On Lu, 21 iul 14, 21:54:48, Erwan David wrote: >> > Le 21/07/2014 21:33, Joe a écrit : >> > > Let us hope so. Tonight's upgrade to sid requires the removal of >> > > sysvinit-core... >> > > >> > >> > libpam-systemd 204 depends systemd-sysv|systemd-shim >> > libpam-systemd 208 depends systemd-sysv >> > >> > Alternative disappeared (and systemd-sysv conflicts sysvinit-core) >> > >> > But thta's in testing... >> >> You might want to wait a little longer: >> https://lists.debian.org/87mwc9gfsw....@xoog.err.no >> >> Kind regards, >> Andrie > > I know. I would be more trustful if there was a dependency in the form > systemd-sysv | systemd-shim (> 6.3) rather than the plain disapearance > of systemd-dhim, which means that not onbly must we wait for the new > systemd-shim to appear, but also for a new libpam-systemd package to > appear. > > And I have big doubts about the fact that systemd developpers will > produce a new package with only difference a changed depends clause.
Just as well you don't have time to test 'testing', otherwise we might think you were wanting to use 'testing' in production :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caosgnsqwetkzq-a-b7e4jk3ynpwlojdpcnthzazbv38_pwp...@mail.gmail.com